Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit, rollback
907
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: + + + + + +
more to be added later
'''Admissible evidence''' is [[evidence]] that can be legally and properly introduced in a civil or criminal [[trial]] for consideration by the finder of fact.
'''Admissible evidence''' is [[evidence]] that can be legally and properly introduced in a civil or criminal [[trial]] for consideration by the finder of fact.
The general rule for evidence is that if it is ''relevant'', it is admissible, unless it falls into a category of evidence that is excluded. Relevance here means that the evidence is something that will aid the court in determining the truth of any facts in dispute. Evidence that might be considered relevant, can be excluded if its value in assisting the Court, is outweighed by any prejudice that the evidence will create.
An example of evidence that is potentially relevant but excluded for its prejudicial effect is evidence of past convictions. A court's role is to determine what happened, and who was responsible, evidence of previous convictions could suggest that the defendant is capable of committing a crime, but the effect of the evidence would too often make the judge or jury (jury in particular) ''assume'' that the defendant was guilty, irrespective of the facts of the case.
Other evidence that may be relevant might be excluded for its unreliability. The classic case of this is [[hearsay evidence]]. What someone said to another about what happened is generally excluded because there is no way of cross-examining the person making the comment.
[[Category:Legal Terms]]
[[Category:Legal Terms]]
[[category:Evidence]]
[[category:Evidence]]