Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Talk:Oxymoron (view source)

Revision as of 17:23, April 14, 2012

217 bytes added ,  17:23, April 14, 2012
→‎I'll look for a quote by Feymann to add on this point: Aren't oxymorons often poor candidates for either side of the oxymoron? For example, a "base-stealing slugger" is probably not-so-good at e
Line 13: Line 13:     
:But more amusing: Feynman negated both parts of your so-called ''oxymoron'' (''neither good mathematicians nor good physicists'') Can this even be done to a real oxymoron without getting a new one? [[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 13:09, 14 April 2012 (EDT)
 
:But more amusing: Feynman negated both parts of your so-called ''oxymoron'' (''neither good mathematicians nor good physicists'') Can this even be done to a real oxymoron without getting a new one? [[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 13:09, 14 April 2012 (EDT)
 +
 +
::Aren't oxymorons often poor candidates for either side of the oxymoron?  For example, a "base-stealing slugger" is probably not-so-good at either skill.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 13:23, 14 April 2012 (EDT)
Aschlafly
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,367

edits

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:MobileDiff/975756"

Navigation menu