Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
446 bytes removed ,  19:46, April 14, 2012
Tidied up intro. Question Einstein!
Line 1: Line 1: −
'''E=mc&sup2;''' is a meaningless, almost nonsensical, statement that purports to relate all matter to light.<ref>The equation claims that the total energy ''E'' of a body in all forms is equal to that body's mass ''m'' multiplied by the square of the speed of light ''c''. The equation only holds true if [[SI]] units are used, hence ''E'' is measured in [[joule]]s, ''m'' in [[kilogram|kilograms]] and ''c'' in [[metre]]s per [[second]]. In other systems of units an additional [[constant]] of proportionality would be required.</ref>  No theory has successfully unified the laws governing mass (''i.e.'', gravity) with the laws governing light (''i.e.'', electromagnetism).  Numerous attempts to derive it in general from first principles have failed.<ref>Many leading scientists (including Lord Rutherford and Princeton Physics Professor [[Robert Dicke]]) rejected the [[Theory of Relativity]].</ref> is an equation that, according to the [[theory of relativity]], describes the equivalence of matter and energy.<ref>According to the [[theory of relativity]], this equation describes the equivalence of matter and energy.  This equation claims that the total energy ''E'' of a body in all forms is equal to that body's mass ''m'' multiplied by the square of the speed of light ''c''.  In [[natural units]], where ''c'' is set to be 1 and [[dimensionless|without dimension]], the equation becomes  ''E''=''m''.</ref> In fact, no theory has successfully unified the laws governing mass (''i.e.'', gravity) with the laws governing light (''i.e.'', electromagnetism).  Simply put, E=mc&sup2; is [[liberal]] claptrap. But political pressure has since made it impossible for anyone pursuing an academic career in science to even question the validity of this nonsensical equation.
+
'''E=mc&sup2;''' is a meaningless, almost nonsensical, statement that purports to relate all [[matter]] to [[light]].<ref>The [[equation]] claims that the total [[energy]] ''E'' of a body in all forms is equal to that body's mass ''m'' multiplied by the square of the speed of light ''c''. The equation only holds true if [[SI]] units are used, hence ''E'' is measured in [[joule]]s, ''m'' in [[kilogram|kilograms]] and ''c'' in [[metre]]s per [[second]]. In other systems of units an additional [[constant]] of proportionality would be required. In [[natural units]], where ''c'' is set to be 1 and [[dimensionless|without dimension]], the equation becomes  ''E''=''m''.</ref> In fact, no [[theory]] has successfully unified the [[law]]s governing [[mass]] (''i.e.'', [[gravity]]) with the laws governing light (''i.e.'', [[electromagnetism]]), and numerous attempts to derive '''E=mc&sup2;''' in general from first principles have failed.<ref>Many leading scientists (including Lord Rutherford and Princeton Physics Professor [[Robert Dicke]]) rejected the [[Theory of Relativity]].</ref> [[Politics|Political]] pressure, however, has since made it impossible for anyone pursuing an academic career in [[science]] to even question the validity of this nonsensical [[equation]]. Simply put, '''E=mc&sup2;''' is [[liberal]] claptrap.
    
[[Biblical Scientific Foreknowledge]] predicts that a unified theory of all the laws of physics is impossible, because light and matter were created at different times, in different ways, as described in the [[Book of Genesis]].
 
[[Biblical Scientific Foreknowledge]] predicts that a unified theory of all the laws of physics is impossible, because light and matter were created at different times, in different ways, as described in the [[Book of Genesis]].
93

edits

Navigation menu