Changes

This project began to provide a trustworthy resource for students that would be free of the liberal bias that permeates Wikipedia. This site has since grown enormously and includes contributions by scholars worldwide. The index has lectures and study lists that are helpful to students. Conservapedia is rapidly becoming one of the largest and most reliable online resources of its kind, without the liberal and anti-Christian bias of other online sources like Wikipedia.

This project began to provide a trustworthy resource for students that would be free of the liberal bias that permeates Wikipedia. This site has since grown enormously and includes contributions by scholars worldwide. The index has lectures and study lists that are helpful to students. Conservapedia is rapidly becoming one of the largest and most reliable online resources of its kind, without the liberal and anti-Christian bias of other online sources like Wikipedia.

2. Is this your primary full-time job or do you have other projects currently in progress?  

2. Is this your primary full-time job or do you have other projects currently in progress?  

I am a practicing conservative attorney who also teaches college-level courses to teenagers.

I am a conservative practicing attorney who also teaches college-level courses to teenagers.

3. What are you hoping to accomplish with this new website?

3. What are you hoping to accomplish with this new website?

-- circulate daily news censored by other media outlets (see http://www.conservapedia.com for examples)

-- circulate daily news censored by other media outlets (see http://www.conservapedia.com for examples)

4. How do you justify Conservapedia being an accurate reference page, when “joeblow” can log on and add/ edit pages?  

4. How do you justify Conservapedia being an accurate reference page, when “joeblow” can log on and add/ edit pages?  

We have a merit-based system that facilitates correction of entries, and our "cream" rises to the top.  Our editors are top-flight and we have much higher standards that Wikipedia.  For example, we cut down on errors by prohibiting gossip, which Wikipedia allows.  We also prohibit obscenity, while Wikipedia allows even pornographic images.

We have a merit-based system that facilitates correction of entries, and our "cream" rises to the top.  Our editors are topflight and we have much higher standards that Wikipedia.  For example, we cut down on errors by prohibiting gossip, which Wikipedia allows.  We also prohibit obscenity, while Wikipedia allows even pornographic images.

 

5. Is every single entry reviewed for accuracy?  

5. Is every single entry reviewed for accuracy?  

6. How would you answer the charge that conservapedia is tilting the views to the “right”… just like Wikipedia tilts to the “left”? Shouldn’t an encyclopedia’s information be balanced and just represent the facts?  

6. How would you answer the charge that conservapedia is tilting the views to the “right”… just like Wikipedia tilts to the “left”? Shouldn’t an encyclopedia’s information be balanced and just represent the facts?  

Conservapedia merely prohibits liberal bias.  We are neutral to the facts.  We have some liberal contributors, but they must stick to the facts.

Conservapedia merely prohibits liberal bias.  We are neutral to the facts.  We have some liberal contributors, but they must stick to the facts.

7. You're claiming to be a "conservative encyclopedia that people can trust" what kind of content/ censorship guidelines will you use to measure "questionable" entries?

7. You're claiming to be a "conservative encyclopedia that people can trust" what kind of content/ censorship guidelines will you use to measure "questionable" entries?

↑ Sources should be authoritative works, not merely published opinions by others. No sources advocating or supporting unlawful activity of any kind are allowed.

↑ Sources should be authoritative works, not merely published opinions by others. No sources advocating or supporting unlawful activity of any kind are allowed.

8. Wikipedia has cornered the market for people to use as a quick reference... how will you be able to compete with them since they have such a head start? Can you catch up?

8. Wikipedia has cornered the market for people to use as a quick reference... how will you be able to compete with them since they have such a head start? Can you catch up?

Wikipedia is like Kool-Aid, a favored first drink for kids.  But like Kool-Aid, it does not satisfy.  Many Wikipedia users, particularly smarter ones, want a better “beverage”.  That’s Conservapedia.

'''Wikipedia is like Kool-Aid, a favored first drink for kids.  But like Kool-Aid, Wikipedia does not satisfy.  Many Wikipedia users, particularly smarter ones, want a better “beverage”.  That’s Conservapedia.'''

I think a brain drain is already occurring from Wikipedia.  Quality does count for something in encyclopedias.

I think a brain drain is already occurring from Wikipedia.  Quality does matter in encyclopedias.

Many Wikipedia users do not yet realize that it has pornographic images and pervasive liberal bias, and many will leave as they realize that.

Many Wikipedia users do not yet realize that it has pornographic images and pervasive liberal bias, and many will leave as they realize that.

9.        Has your organization had any contact with Wikipedia?

9.        Has your organization had any contact with Wikipedia?

No, but I have debated one of its representatives on BBC radio.

No, but I have debated one of its representatives on BBC radio.

10.        Any additional thoughts/ comments you would like to share with readers....

10.        Any additional thoughts/ comments you would like to share with readers....

Our audience has exceeded 5 million page views.  Conservapedia is the future and we welcome visits and contributions by everyone.

Our audience has exceeded 5 million page views.  Conservapedia is the future and we welcome visits and contributions by everyone.  

 

--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 13:04, 9 April 2007 (EDT)

--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 13:04, 9 April 2007 (EDT)