Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 10: Line 10:  
:::But, again, if you were right that "[t]here is no need to campaign against Gingrich," then Santorum won't do it.  But I predict he does.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 11:00, 15 April 2012 (EDT)
 
:::But, again, if you were right that "[t]here is no need to campaign against Gingrich," then Santorum won't do it.  But I predict he does.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 11:00, 15 April 2012 (EDT)
 
:::::If he does, Santorum is even dumber than I thought he might be, and the Republican Party is even more out-of-touch with reality than I had figured. Wasting any sort of resources on a guy who has barely more than a fifth of the delegates as does the leader at the half-way point of the race and who doesn't have any reporters travelling with his campaign would be beyond stupid. [[User:DVMRoberts|DVMRoberts]] 11:14, 15 April 2012 (EDT)
 
:::::If he does, Santorum is even dumber than I thought he might be, and the Republican Party is even more out-of-touch with reality than I had figured. Wasting any sort of resources on a guy who has barely more than a fifth of the delegates as does the leader at the half-way point of the race and who doesn't have any reporters travelling with his campaign would be beyond stupid. [[User:DVMRoberts|DVMRoberts]] 11:14, 15 April 2012 (EDT)
 +
 +
== Evidence that Santorum will not "campaign against Gingrich" ==
 +
 +
Two days ago, at the NRA convention, with what may be his last guaranteed national audience for the foreseeable future, Santorum [http://www.foxnews.com/us/2012/04/13/santorum-hails-nra-fight-for-individual-freedom/ focused his remarks on Obama], not on Gingrich. [[User:DVMRoberts|DVMRoberts]] 13:36, 15 April 2012 (EDT)
54

edits

Navigation menu