| − | '''''Conservapedia''''' content has often been proven right on topics ranging from science to politics to the World Cup,<ref>Although incredibly rare, [[Conservapedia proven wrong|Conservapedia has been occasionally wrong]], but usually about trivial matters and even then it is usually mostly right).</ref> even for predictions that some [[liberals]] have ridiculed. Examples include: | + | '''''Conservapedia''''' content has often been proven right on topics ranging from science to politics to the World Cup. (Although incredibly rare, [[Conservapedia proven wrong|Conservapedia has been occasionally wrong]], but usually about trivial matters and even then it is usually mostly right.) This is true even for predictions that some [[liberals]] have ridiculed. Examples include: |