Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Let's not make the footnotes misleading
Line 1: Line 1: −
'''''Conservapedia''''' content has often been proven right on topics ranging from science to politics to the World Cup,<ref>Although incredibly rare, [[Conservapedia proven wrong|Conservapedia has been occasionally wrong]], but usually about trivial matters and even then it is usually mostly right).</ref> even for predictions that some [[liberals]] have ridiculed.  Examples include:
+
'''''Conservapedia''''' content has often been proven right on topics ranging from science to politics to the World Cup. Although incredibly rare, [[Conservapedia proven wrong|Conservapedia has been occasionally wrong]]<ref>But usually about trivial matters and even then it is usually mostly right.</ref> even for predictions that some [[liberals]] have ridiculed.  Examples include:
    
{| class="wikitable"
 
{| class="wikitable"
Line 157: Line 157:  
*[[Conservapedia proven wrong]] - A much shorter list!
 
*[[Conservapedia proven wrong]] - A much shorter list!
   −
== References ==
+
== Footnotes ==
    
<references/>
 
<references/>
 
[[Category:Conservapedia]]
 
[[Category:Conservapedia]]
Block, SkipCaptcha
356

edits

Navigation menu