Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,789
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: +
Conservapedia:How Conservapedia Differs from Wikipedia (view source)
Revision as of 18:15, April 22, 2012
, 18:15, April 22, 2012Wikipedia is part of the hearsay society, drawing no distinction between what is factual and what is unreliable hearsay. We at Conservapedia separate the wheat from the chaff.
# Wikipedia is part of the [[hearsay society]], drawing no distinction between what is factual and what is unreliable [[hearsay]]. We at [[Conservapedia]] separate the wheat from the chaff.
# We at [[Conservapedia]] allow broader reuse of our material than Wikipedia does. By entering information on Wikipedia you are actually losing rights to your own material to the extent anyone else edits it, as you cannot then copy your entry for use elsewhere without complying with Wikipedia's burdensome copyright restrictions.
# We at [[Conservapedia]] allow broader reuse of our material than Wikipedia does. By entering information on Wikipedia you are actually losing rights to your own material to the extent anyone else edits it, as you cannot then copy your entry for use elsewhere without complying with Wikipedia's burdensome copyright restrictions.
# We are an educational resource, including lectures and study guides, and we welcome students and adults seeking to learn. Wikipedia has no lectures or study guides and many of its entries and discussions are anti-intellectual in nature.
# We are an educational resource, including lectures and study guides, and we welcome students and adults seeking to learn. Wikipedia has no lectures or study guides and many of its entries and discussions are anti-intellectual in nature.