Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit, rollback
5,023
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 167:
Line 167: − + Line 173:
Line 173: − + Line 208:
Line 208: − + − + + +
→A few questions for Aschlafly regarding the experiment of Cockroft and Walton
[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 09:29, 27 March 2012 (EDT)
[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 09:29, 27 March 2012 (EDT)
== A few questions for Aschlafly regarding the experiment of Cockroft and Walton ==
== A few questions for Aschlafly regarding the experiment of Cockcroft¹ and Walton ==
I'd appreciate an answer by Aschlafly (and him alone) to the following questions:
I'd appreciate an answer by Aschlafly (and him alone) to the following questions:
'''1.''' Do you accept that the mass of the Lithium-kernel (<sup>7</sup>Li), of alpha-particles (<sup>4</sup>He) and of protons (<sup>1</sup>H) can be measured fairly accurately, as these are charged particles?
'''1.''' Do you accept that the mass of the Lithium-kernel (<sup>7</sup>Li), of alpha-particles (<sup>4</sup>He) and of protons (<sup>1</sup>H) can be measured fairly accurately, as these are charged particles?
'''2.''' Do you accept the measurements for the mass of the particles as used by Cockroft and Walton, i.e.
'''2.''' Do you accept the measurements for the mass of the particles as used by Cockcroft¹ and Walton, i.e.
:::{|
:::{|
!particle
!particle
Aschlafly, you haven't answered any of the questions above! Instead you are talking about something completely different:
Aschlafly, you haven't answered any of the questions above! Instead you are talking about something completely different:
*We are not talking about a ''chemical'' reaction! You should know the difference.
*We are not talking about a ''chemical'' reaction! You should know the difference.
*Cockroft claims that the energy comes from the loss of mass - and he calculates it according to ''E=mc²''. Please read (and understand!) his lecture.
*Cockcroft¹ claims that the energy comes from the loss of mass - and he calculates it according to ''E=mc²''. Please read (and understand!) his lecture.
*Please give a list of a few (or at least a single) experiment which contradicts the formula. This should be easy, as you stated that ''Undoubtedly many other experiments contradict the formula''. Oh, wait, you made that up...
*Please give a list of a few (or at least a single) experiment which contradicts the formula. This should be easy, as you stated that ''Undoubtedly many other experiments contradict the formula''. Oh, wait, you made that up...
*Please answer the questions 1 to 9: all the question are covered in Cockroft's lecture, so I'd be interested in your explanation!
*Please answer the questions 1 to 9: all the question are covered in Cockcroft's¹ lecture, so I'd be interested in your explanation!
[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 11:32, 31 March 2012 (EDT)
[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 11:32, 31 March 2012 (EDT)
:AugustO, if you cannot even spell Cockcroft's name properly, how can Andy take anything you say seriously? --[[User:AndreaM|AndreaM]] 22:03, 31 March 2012 (EDT)
:AugustO, if you cannot even spell Cockcroft's name properly, how can Andy take anything you say seriously? --[[User:AndreaM|AndreaM]] 22:03, 31 March 2012 (EDT)
(1) : spelling of ''Cockcroft corrected [[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 01:22, 25 April 2012 (EDT)
== Move ==
== Move ==