31
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 6:
Line 6: + + + + +
Talk:Atheism is a religion (view source)
Revision as of 16:03, April 27, 2012
, 16:03, April 27, 2012no edit summary
...does that mean that it's impossible for a person to not have a religion? [[User:JohnMcL|JohnMcL]] 19:34, 9 August 2011 (EDT)
...does that mean that it's impossible for a person to not have a religion? [[User:JohnMcL|JohnMcL]] 19:34, 9 August 2011 (EDT)
== Overly broad definition ==
Not trying to be funny with this, I just want to know: by Smart's description, how can we consider atheism a religion and not, say, Star Wars fandom? It has experiential (many Star Wars fans recall the awe and inspiration they get from the original movies), social (all sorts of conventions and social gatherings, including two online video games), ethical (Star Wars clearly proscribes following a path of spiritual self-improvement rather than embracing the temptations of emotion), ritual (releases and rereleases of the movies are significant events, and the watching of the films themselves is observed with such fervor that any disturbance, like the revised editions, is met with fury and upheaval), and material (reverence for the original actors, reverence for the original props and any reproductions of them, etc). The only one I won't make a case for is Narrative, but this is hardly a problem as Smart admits they're not all necessary.
So my question is, seriously: since we only need to get most of the items to classify a religion, isn't Star Wars fandom a religion? Wasn't the Civil Rights movement? Isn't any widespread movement or appreciation of anything? Please don't dismiss this as blank criticism; I would like an answer. [[User:williagz|williagz]] 12:02, 27 April 2012 (EDT)