I find this to be an interesting article, but I must take issue with the following claim:
I find this to be an interesting article, but I must take issue with the following claim:
−
</br>
+
<blockquote>
<blockquote>
If each of 43 counterexamples has merely a 10% chance of being valid -- an underestimate -- then the probability that the Earth is billions of years old is only 1%.
If each of 43 counterexamples has merely a 10% chance of being valid -- an underestimate -- then the probability that the Earth is billions of years old is only 1%.