Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Double-slit logic experiment (view source)

Revision as of 22:46, May 6, 2012

313 bytes added ,  22:46, May 6, 2012
→‎Simple case: This tends to confirm that logic and uncertainty -- not waves -- require the surprising result of the double-slit experiment.
Line 19: Line 19:  
:Total = 1
 
:Total = 1
   −
Does the answer change if there is observation of the double slits, to remove the uncertainty at that level, as in advanced forms of the [[double-slit experiment]] using particles?
+
'''''Does the answer change if there is observation of the double slits, to remove the uncertainty at that level, as in advanced forms of the [[double-slit experiment]] using particles?'''''
 +
 
 +
'''''Answer''''': yes, arguably.  The pattern on the distant screen is never perfectly symmetric if there is observation of which particles pass through the double slits.  This tends to confirm that logic and uncertainty -- not waves -- require the surprising result of the [[double-slit experiment]].
    
==See also==
 
==See also==
Aschlafly
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,426

edits

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:MobileDiff/979939"

Navigation menu