| Line 91: |
Line 91: |
| | |[[Barack Obama]]'s [[American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009|"stimulus" package]] fails. Many Americans lose their jobs and have their unemployment benefits run out. In 2011, Fox News reports that most unemployed no longer receive unemployment benefits.<ref>http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/11/05/most-us-unemployed-no-longer-receive-benefits/</ref> Homelessness increases and "[[Obamaville]]s" spring up.<ref>http://www.thebradentontimes.com/news/2011/11/09/community/national_hunger_and_homelessness_awareness_week_puts_spotlight_on_increasing_need/</ref> Unemployment in the United States and many other countries remains high.<ref>http://www.bls.gov/fls/intl_unemployment_rates_monthly.htm</ref><ref>http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/statistics_explained/index.php/Unemployment_statistics</ref> In 2011, Cafe Press is selling unemployed sociology major bumper stickers.<ref>http://www.cafepress.com/+unemployed_sociology_major_bumper_sticker,25387924</ref> | | |[[Barack Obama]]'s [[American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009|"stimulus" package]] fails. Many Americans lose their jobs and have their unemployment benefits run out. In 2011, Fox News reports that most unemployed no longer receive unemployment benefits.<ref>http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/11/05/most-us-unemployed-no-longer-receive-benefits/</ref> Homelessness increases and "[[Obamaville]]s" spring up.<ref>http://www.thebradentontimes.com/news/2011/11/09/community/national_hunger_and_homelessness_awareness_week_puts_spotlight_on_increasing_need/</ref> Unemployment in the United States and many other countries remains high.<ref>http://www.bls.gov/fls/intl_unemployment_rates_monthly.htm</ref><ref>http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/statistics_explained/index.php/Unemployment_statistics</ref> In 2011, Cafe Press is selling unemployed sociology major bumper stickers.<ref>http://www.cafepress.com/+unemployed_sociology_major_bumper_sticker,25387924</ref> |
| | |World economy continues to skate on thin ice and the Eurozone is experiencing significant economic problems. | | |World economy continues to skate on thin ice and the Eurozone is experiencing significant economic problems. |
| | + | |- |
| | + | |March 14, 2010<ref>http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Presidential_Election_2012&oldid=762021</ref> |
| | + | |''Conservapedia'' predicted that [[Rick Santorum]] was a stalking horse of [[Mitt Romney]] |
| | + | |Santorum is viewed as the only other option besides Romney, at the expense of [[Newt Gingrich]] |
| | + | |After taking votes away from Gingrich, Santorum surprised many by dropping out of the race, practically giving the victory to Romney; Santorum then endorsed Romney-like [[Jon Bruning]] instead of the [[conservative]] [[Don Stenberg]] for [[U.S. Senate]] in [[Nebraska]], and then endorsed Romney in a late-night email. |
| | + | |April to May 7, 2012 |
| | |- | | |- |
| | |mid-June 2010 | | |mid-June 2010 |
| Line 151: |
Line 157: |
| | |Eventually the lamestream media admitted that Rick Santorum was the winner | | |Eventually the lamestream media admitted that Rick Santorum was the winner |
| | |early February 2012 | | |early February 2012 |
| − | |-
| |
| − | |March 14, 2010<ref>http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Presidential_Election_2012&oldid=762021</ref>
| |
| − | |''Conservapedia'' predicted that [[Rick Santorum]] was a stalking horse of [[Mitt Romney]]
| |
| − | |Santorum is viewed as the only other option besides Romney, at the expense of [[Newt Gingrich]]
| |
| − | |After taking votes away from Gingrich, Santorum dropped out of the race, practically giving the victory to Romney; Santorum then endorsed Romney-like [[Jon Bruning]] instead of the [[conservative]] [[Don Stenberg]] for [[U.S. Senate]] in [[Nebraska]].
| |
| − | |April 2012
| |
| | |- | | |- |
| | |mid-March 2012 | | |mid-March 2012 |