Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
752
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 6:
Line 6: − *[[Evolutionists]] use the [[argument from poor design]] to attempt to disprove [[creationism]] −
Without the second part of this statement (which was deleted by another editor), this is no longer an example of a stolen concept. Either put it all back, or put none of it back.
*[[Pro-abortion]] activists argue that since there are no such things as [[unalienable rights]], there is no [[right to life]], so that there is an unalienable right to [[abortion]].
*[[Pro-abortion]] activists argue that since there are no such things as [[unalienable rights]], there is no [[right to life]], so that there is an unalienable right to [[abortion]].
*Liberals justify [[special rights]] as furthering [[equality]] and oppose genuine equality as a special right.
*Liberals justify [[special rights]] as furthering [[equality]] and oppose genuine equality as a special right.
==See also==
==See also==
*[[Reductio Ad Absurdum]], a form of argument that can be used to expose a stolen concept
*[[Reductio Ad Absurdum]], a form of argument that can be used to expose a stolen concept