Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Talk:Theory of relativity (view source)

Revision as of 00:25, May 13, 2012

452 bytes added ,  00:25, May 13, 2012
→‎Newtonian explanation of Mercury's precession: If the theory were correct, then there would be no need for liberals to censor debate or alternative theories.
Line 269: Line 269:     
OK, how do you explain that adjusting the exponent in Newtonian gravity doesn't account for the orbits of the other planets? You say it has to do with politics. It has nothing to do with politics--the other theory just doesn't work! [[User:AndyFrankinson|AndyFrankinson]] 20:33, 11 May 2012 (EDT)
 
OK, how do you explain that adjusting the exponent in Newtonian gravity doesn't account for the orbits of the other planets? You say it has to do with politics. It has nothing to do with politics--the other theory just doesn't work! [[User:AndyFrankinson|AndyFrankinson]] 20:33, 11 May 2012 (EDT)
 +
 +
:I doubt the minor tweak in the exponent would affect the other orbits.  The orbit of Mercury would be far more sensitive to such a tweak than anything else.
 +
 +
:The broader question remains:  isn't the [[censorship]] of any alternative to the [[Theory of Relativity]] obvious?  If the theory were correct, then there would be no need for [[liberals]] to censor debate or alternative theories.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 20:25, 12 May 2012 (EDT)
    
== First sentence of article contradicted by the rest ==
 
== First sentence of article contradicted by the rest ==
Aschlafly
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,530

edits

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:MobileDiff/981117"

Navigation menu