603
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 282:
Line 282: − + − #** PS, Ed, the revert you just did of my work on this article was the last straw. [[User:Teresita|Teresita]] 07:31, 10 April 2007 (EDT) Line 294:
Line 293: − − :As I suspected, it is a Conservative Christian view that articles can be locked down to give the protecting sysop an advantage in an editing situation. [[User:Teresita|Teresita]] 14:47, 10 April 2007 (EDT)
→Fairness
Yes:
Yes:
# Gonna assume this gap is for people to fill! It's not just unfair, its an abuse of privilege! Sysop's who use their powers in such a way should have their powers removed! [[User:MatteeNeutra|MatteeNeutra]] 07:28, 10 April 2007 (EDT)
# Gonna assume this gap is for people to fill! It's not just unfair, its an abuse of privilege! Sysop's who use their powers in such a way should have their powers removed! [[User:MatteeNeutra|MatteeNeutra]] 07:28, 10 April 2007 (EDT)
# Yes, I'm seeing this now with [[Young Earth Creationism]] which is currently being [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Young_Earth_Creationism&curid=6662&diff=96819&oldid=96811 edited by the protecting sysop while it is locked down]. What this means is that if you get ops, you can turn any portion of Conservapedia into your own personal blog and no one can do anything about it. [[User:Teresita|Teresita]] 07:28, 10 April 2007 (EDT)
# Yes (to maintain count, rest of comments are being backed out by commentatrix) [[User:Teresita|Teresita]] 17:01, 10 April 2007 (EDT)
#Well, I'll make it unanimous then.
#Well, I'll make it unanimous then.
#*We need to find a way to agree. I suggest [[Conservapedia:planning|planning]]. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 07:37, 10 April 2007 (EDT)
#*We need to find a way to agree. I suggest [[Conservapedia:planning|planning]]. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 07:37, 10 April 2007 (EDT)
We need to find a way to agree. I suggest planning.'' --Ed Poor 07:37, 10 April 2007 (EDT)
We need to find a way to agree. I suggest planning.'' --Ed Poor 07:37, 10 April 2007 (EDT)
Unanimous? Sorry to break it to you Little Kings...you ain't the majority around here Anything produced will give full faith and credit to the Conservative side and the Christian side. --~ [[User:TK|TK]] <sup>[[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]]</sup> 14:41, 10 April 2007 (EDT)
Unanimous? Sorry to break it to you Little Kings...you ain't the majority around here Anything produced will give full faith and credit to the Conservative side and the Christian side. --~ [[User:TK|TK]] <sup>[[User_talk:TK|MyTalk]]</sup> 14:41, 10 April 2007 (EDT)
::Nothing wrong with that, TK -- so long as you do no violence to the truth while presenting the conservative side. Unfortunately trying to pass Hitler off as a leftist and implying that Henry Luce would have fired reporters for referring to the Nazis as "right wing" does violence to the truth, whether the writer is deliberately misrepresenting things or is just saying what he or she would LIKE to be true without going through the sordid process of actually READING A BOOK OR TWO on the subject at hand. On a website that is supposed to be "educational" those kind of "errors" should be intoleratable to anyone no matter what their political persuasion. --[[User:PF Fox|PF Fox]] 14:48, 10 April 2007 (EDT)
::Nothing wrong with that, TK -- so long as you do no violence to the truth while presenting the conservative side. Unfortunately trying to pass Hitler off as a leftist and implying that Henry Luce would have fired reporters for referring to the Nazis as "right wing" does violence to the truth, whether the writer is deliberately misrepresenting things or is just saying what he or she would LIKE to be true without going through the sordid process of actually READING A BOOK OR TWO on the subject at hand. On a website that is supposed to be "educational" those kind of "errors" should be intoleratable to anyone no matter what their political persuasion. --[[User:PF Fox|PF Fox]] 14:48, 10 April 2007 (EDT)