Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,952
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 8:
Line 8: + + + + + +
→generally speaking I think it is better to add sources rather than remove content: new section
Also, I noticed that at least one entry you added to [[Examples of Bias in Wikipedia]] was already at [[Examples of Bias in Wikipedia: Conspiracy theories]]. There may be others. I fixed one, and I now understand why there's an effort to move stuff off that main page because the page took a really long time to save, and I'm on a T2 speed line. [[User:SMiller1|SMiller1]] 10:56, 23 December 2010 (EST)
Also, I noticed that at least one entry you added to [[Examples of Bias in Wikipedia]] was already at [[Examples of Bias in Wikipedia: Conspiracy theories]]. There may be others. I fixed one, and I now understand why there's an effort to move stuff off that main page because the page took a really long time to save, and I'm on a T2 speed line. [[User:SMiller1|SMiller1]] 10:56, 23 December 2010 (EST)
== generally speaking I think it is better to add sources rather than remove content ==
Generally speaking, I think it is better to add sources rather than remove content. If you can't find sources, then it makes more sense to remove content.
Personally, I heavily source my material and wish others would to, but wikis often have people who do not source their material. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 05:26, 19 May 2012 (EDT)