Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,794
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 93:
Line 93: − − == hey == − − Evolution is supported by all of the facts.
Reverted edits by JohnS42 (talk) to last revision by AK
:::: [[95 Theses against Evolution]]--[[User:AK|AK]] 17:19, 4 May 2012 (EDT)
:::: [[95 Theses against Evolution]]--[[User:AK|AK]] 17:19, 4 May 2012 (EDT)
:::::Add. "These are well-trained people who have a high level of scientific knowledge and '''know what they're talking about'''. '''Unlike your faith-based''', unscientific nonsense creation "theory", evolution has abundant evidence " - I'm afraid that's something we can agree on, just see [http://conservapedia.com/Talk:Evolution#Evolution_as_a_.22fact.22 this].--[[User:AK|AK]] 09:14, 5 May 2012 (EDT)
:::::Add. "These are well-trained people who have a high level of scientific knowledge and '''know what they're talking about'''. '''Unlike your faith-based''', unscientific nonsense creation "theory", evolution has abundant evidence " - I'm afraid that's something we can agree on, just see [http://conservapedia.com/Talk:Evolution#Evolution_as_a_.22fact.22 this].--[[User:AK|AK]] 09:14, 5 May 2012 (EDT)