Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,387
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: − − ==Answers to 15 questions== − The debate page on the 15 Questions actually has answers to all of the questions. I think this article should reflect that fact. Something like, "Editors on Conservapedia, however, have been able to provide answers to all of the questions, putting their usefulness, and the validity of the Question Evolution Campaign, into serious doubt." [[User:TonyPark|TonyPark]] 23:57, 11 January 2012 (EST) Line 52:
Line 49: + + + + +
Talk:Question evolution! campaign (view source)
Revision as of 23:46, May 21, 2012
, 23:46, May 21, 2012no edit summary
[[Talk:Question_evolution!_campaign/Archive_1|Archive 1]]
[[Talk:Question_evolution!_campaign/Archive_1|Archive 1]]
[[Talk:Question_evolution!_campaign/Archive_2|Archive 2]]
[[Talk:Question_evolution!_campaign/Archive_2|Archive 2]]
== "Question Evolution" Link ==
== "Question Evolution" Link ==
:::::::Rand, If it is important for you to know if there has been media coverage, then ask your locale librarian to help you do a search on newspapers coverage. Since the only thing that is necessary for the campaign to be effective is for students to ask their teachers the 15 questions in class and for people to examine the questions with an open mind, I don't see why media coverage is paramount though at this early stage. For example, the Question evolution blog (network) has only been around a month, as can be seen [http://questionevolution.blogspot.com/search?updated-max=2011-11-23T22:11:00-08:00&max-results=7 HERE]. The Traditional Values Coalition seemed to jump in right around the beginning of school in late August based on their website and the WND story which cited their website.[http://www.wnd.com/2011/08/337937/] That is only 3 months ago. Maybe it is just me, but Christians tend to be more patient and tenacious and don't expect instant results nor do they expect mainstream media validation. Plus, there are so many ways now to get the word out without the use of mainstream media. Also, I wouldn't be surprised if social movements go through stages and some preparation, recruiting and organizing is involved before deciding to seek attention from press outlets in a significant way. Plus, although some social movements probably start out with a book/movie/video, I am guessing the converse also happens and social movements develop material as they go along. I would think that books/movies/videos tend to attract more media attention. I know that impatient people like the fire, aim, ready approach, but I personally think the ready, aim, fire approach has more wisdom. :) However, I can see how a person who comments on a talk page before carefully reading an article would feel differently. :) [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 18:12, 4 January 2012 (EST)
:::::::Rand, If it is important for you to know if there has been media coverage, then ask your locale librarian to help you do a search on newspapers coverage. Since the only thing that is necessary for the campaign to be effective is for students to ask their teachers the 15 questions in class and for people to examine the questions with an open mind, I don't see why media coverage is paramount though at this early stage. For example, the Question evolution blog (network) has only been around a month, as can be seen [http://questionevolution.blogspot.com/search?updated-max=2011-11-23T22:11:00-08:00&max-results=7 HERE]. The Traditional Values Coalition seemed to jump in right around the beginning of school in late August based on their website and the WND story which cited their website.[http://www.wnd.com/2011/08/337937/] That is only 3 months ago. Maybe it is just me, but Christians tend to be more patient and tenacious and don't expect instant results nor do they expect mainstream media validation. Plus, there are so many ways now to get the word out without the use of mainstream media. Also, I wouldn't be surprised if social movements go through stages and some preparation, recruiting and organizing is involved before deciding to seek attention from press outlets in a significant way. Plus, although some social movements probably start out with a book/movie/video, I am guessing the converse also happens and social movements develop material as they go along. I would think that books/movies/videos tend to attract more media attention. I know that impatient people like the fire, aim, ready approach, but I personally think the ready, aim, fire approach has more wisdom. :) However, I can see how a person who comments on a talk page before carefully reading an article would feel differently. :) [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 18:12, 4 January 2012 (EST)
::::::::There's no reason for the snark. Please refrain. [[User:RandRover|RandRover]] 18:35, 4 January 2012 (EST)
::::::::There's no reason for the snark. Please refrain. [[User:RandRover|RandRover]] 18:35, 4 January 2012 (EST)
==Answers to 15 questions==
The debate page on the 15 Questions actually has answers to all of the questions. I think this article should reflect that fact. Something like, "Editors on Conservapedia, however, have been able to provide answers to all of the questions, putting their usefulness, and the validity of the Question Evolution Campaign, into serious doubt." [[User:TonyPark|TonyPark]] 23:57, 11 January 2012 (EST)
Tony, lame answers don't count. For example, when a student gives poor/wrong answers on a test, he still fails the test. Accordingly, fake/wrong answers to the [http://craetion.com/15-questions 15 questions for evolutionists] attempting to pose as real answers are not a significant development. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 19:46, 21 May 2012 (EDT)
==Who is this campaign aimed to ?==
==Who is this campaign aimed to ?==