Changes

The debate page on the 15 Questions actually has answers to all of the questions. I think this article should reflect that fact. Something like, "Editors on Conservapedia, however, have been able to provide answers to all of the questions, putting their usefulness, and the validity of the Question Evolution Campaign, into serious doubt." [[User:TonyPark|TonyPark]] 23:57, 11 January 2012 (EST)

The debate page on the 15 Questions actually has answers to all of the questions. I think this article should reflect that fact. Something like, "Editors on Conservapedia, however, have been able to provide answers to all of the questions, putting their usefulness, and the validity of the Question Evolution Campaign, into serious doubt." [[User:TonyPark|TonyPark]] 23:57, 11 January 2012 (EST)

TonyPark, lame answers don't count. For example, when a student gives poor/wrong answers on a test, he still fails the test. Accordingly, fake/wrong answers to the [http://craetion.com/15-questions 15 questions for evolutionists] attempting to pose as real answers are not a  significant development. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 19:46, 21 May 2012 (EDT)

TonyPark, lame answers don't count. For example, when a student gives poor/wrong answers on a test, he still fails the test. Accordingly, fake/wrong answers to the [http://craetion.com/15-questions 15 questions for evolutionists] attempting to pose as real answers are not a  significant development. Let me give you a specific example. At YouTube some popular evolutionists tried to answer the 15 questions for evolutionists but utterly failed as can be seen in the video [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sRz0ORtoIRg&feature=BFa&list=PL12B8A2B1F72664EC&lf=plpp_play_all 15 Questions Evolutionists STILL cannot answer] at YouTube. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 19:46, 21 May 2012 (EDT)

==Who is this campaign aimed to ?==

==Who is this campaign aimed to ?==