239
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 230:
Line 230: +
→Name
:What is this hearsay of which you speak? Please, do elaborate rather than throwing cute terms around.
:What is this hearsay of which you speak? Please, do elaborate rather than throwing cute terms around.
:Now, when are you going to fix ''la'' to ''ta''? Hey, if you want Con-pedia to be the laughing-stock of religion, feel free to leave it, but be aware that ''la'' is not a definite article either in Greek or Latin (a language bereft of a definite aticle). BTW, I would doubt Unger misheard the word -- ''if'' he knew Greek, he would have known the definite article off of the top of his head, and if he knew it not he was no ''true'' scholar of the NT. [[User:NousEpirrhytos|NousEpirrhytos]] 17:51, 10 April 2007 (EDT)
:Now, when are you going to fix ''la'' to ''ta''? Hey, if you want Con-pedia to be the laughing-stock of religion, feel free to leave it, but be aware that ''la'' is not a definite article either in Greek or Latin (a language bereft of a definite aticle). BTW, I would doubt Unger misheard the word -- ''if'' he knew Greek, he would have known the definite article off of the top of his head, and if he knew it not he was no ''true'' scholar of the NT. [[User:NousEpirrhytos|NousEpirrhytos]] 17:51, 10 April 2007 (EDT)
:One other point: books on the Civil War, Babe Ruth, etc., have never been claimed to be infallible, so your analogy does not pass muster. [[User:NousEpirrhytos|NousEpirrhytos]] 17:54, 10 April 2007 (EDT)