8
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 470:
Line 470: + + + + +
Conservapedia talk:How Conservapedia Differs from Wikipedia (view source)
Revision as of 03:16, May 25, 2012
, 03:16, May 25, 2012→13: new section
I'm guessing that Conservapedia is a stickler for official names to be used as article names and references rather than any slang or alternetive names. Best example I can think of is that Conservapedia rightly uses the correct name [[Londonderry]] for the city in [[Northern Ireland]] unlike Wikipedia who caved into Irish liberals and now use the incorrect slang term "derry". Shouldn't this be included in the commandments as using correct names for things rather than alternetives. [[User:King1|King1]] 16:14, 14 June 2010 (EDT)
I'm guessing that Conservapedia is a stickler for official names to be used as article names and references rather than any slang or alternetive names. Best example I can think of is that Conservapedia rightly uses the correct name [[Londonderry]] for the city in [[Northern Ireland]] unlike Wikipedia who caved into Irish liberals and now use the incorrect slang term "derry". Shouldn't this be included in the commandments as using correct names for things rather than alternetives. [[User:King1|King1]] 16:14, 14 June 2010 (EDT)
== 13 ==
Wikipedia uses them to encourage new users to edit and help improve articles. Also distracting stub templates? I hardly consider:
This article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. On the bottom the page distracting.
== 13 ==
== 13 ==