Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
263 bytes added ,  22:54, June 2, 2012
m
Reverted edits by Maynardhugh (talk) to last revision by Marianne
Line 51: Line 51:  
* The "hidden variable" interpretation<ref>http://www.reasons.org/resources/non-staff-papers/the-metaphysics-of-quantum-mechanics</ref> says that there is actually a [[determinism|deterministic]] way to predict where the wavefunction will collapse; we simply have not discovered it.  [[Von Neumann]] attempted to prove that there is no such way; however, [[John Stuart Bell]] pointed out an error in his proof.
 
* The "hidden variable" interpretation<ref>http://www.reasons.org/resources/non-staff-papers/the-metaphysics-of-quantum-mechanics</ref> says that there is actually a [[determinism|deterministic]] way to predict where the wavefunction will collapse; we simply have not discovered it.  [[Von Neumann]] attempted to prove that there is no such way; however, [[John Stuart Bell]] pointed out an error in his proof.
 
* The many-worlds interpretation says that each particle does show up at every possible location on its wavefunction; it simply does so in alternate universes.  Thus, myriads of alternate universes are invisibly branching off of our universe every moment.
 
* The many-worlds interpretation says that each particle does show up at every possible location on its wavefunction; it simply does so in alternate universes.  Thus, myriads of alternate universes are invisibly branching off of our universe every moment.
* The currently prevailing interpretation, the Copenhagen interpretation, states that the wavefunctions do ''not'' collapse until someone observes the particle in a certain state; until someone observes it, it exists in a quantum indeterminate state consisting of all possible states.  [[Schrodinger]] demonstrated this concept with [[Schrodinger's cat|his famous cat experiment]].
+
* The currently prevailing interpretation, the Copenhagen interpretation, states that the wavefunctions do ''not'' collapse until someone observes the particle at a certain location; until someone observes it, it exists in a quantum indeterminate state of simultaneously being everywhere in the universeHowever, [[Schrodinger]], with [[Schrodinger's cat|his famous cat experiment]], raised the obvious question: who, or what, constitutes an observer? What distinguishes an observer from the system being observed? In essence, the Copenhagen Interpretation requires a [[soul]] or something else to distinguish observers from inanimate matter.
    
==Applications==
 
==Applications==
Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,790

edits

Navigation menu