Changes

We're not going to have a rant from a repeat-troll who uses a foreign proxy server to post it, and we're not going to have anyone else feel like they can revert the decisions of an admin who responds to it.  If you are liberal and want to preach tolerance, try tolerating us for a change.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 16:46, 5 June 2012 (EDT)

We're not going to have a rant from a repeat-troll who uses a foreign proxy server to post it, and we're not going to have anyone else feel like they can revert the decisions of an admin who responds to it.  If you are liberal and want to preach tolerance, try tolerating us for a change.  [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 16:46, 5 June 2012 (EDT)

:Why would I be on this site if I was liberal? I didn't realize the individual that made that edit used a proxy. I didn't really think his edit was a rant, except for the end where he posted clear undefended attacks on Fox and the Tea Party. He sounded to me like he simply took issue with the stereotype that all liberals obsess over each of the things listed in the article, and wanted to present himself as a liberal that didn't necessarily fit that stereotype. Again, I do agree that the last part of his edit was unacceptable, but perhaps his comment can be kept on the talk page without that last bout of insults he spewed? I am not here to preach tolerance, but if you do choose to not have his words on the talk page, of course I will tolerate that. I would also like to point out, however, that "we're not going to have any one else...revert the decisions" doesn't sound tolerating either. I would not have brought up tolerance at all if it was not an official Conservapedia policy. [[User:CWest|CWest]] 16:54, 5 June 2012 (EDT)

:Why would I be on this site if I was liberal? I didn't realize the individual that made that edit used a proxy. I didn't really think his edit was a rant, except for the end where he posted clear undefended attacks on Fox and the Tea Party. He sounded to me like he simply took issue with the stereotype that all liberals obsess over each of the things listed in the article, and wanted to present himself as a liberal that didn't necessarily fit that stereotype. Again, I do agree that the last part of his edit was unacceptable, but perhaps his comment can be kept on the talk page without that last bout of insults he spewed? I am not here to preach tolerance, but if you do choose to not have his words on the talk page, of course I will tolerate that. I would also like to point out, however, that "we're not going to have any one else...revert the decisions" doesn't sound tolerating either. I would not have brought up tolerance at all if it was not an official Conservapedia policy. [[User:CWest|CWest]] 16:54, 5 June 2012 (EDT)