197
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 3:
Line 3: + + +
Talk:Atheism, polyamory and other immoral relationships (view source)
Revision as of 12:43, June 15, 2012
, 12:43, June 15, 2012no edit summary
When I first edited here I thought it had a lot of potential as a valuable resource for those fed up with liberal propaganda. Now it's just become an idiot's playground, full of nonsense and Andy's weird ideas about new conservative words and zombie Castros. Shame. --[[User:LiamCaldicott|LiamCaldicott]] 19:00, 14 June 2012 (EDT)
When I first edited here I thought it had a lot of potential as a valuable resource for those fed up with liberal propaganda. Now it's just become an idiot's playground, full of nonsense and Andy's weird ideas about new conservative words and zombie Castros. Shame. --[[User:LiamCaldicott|LiamCaldicott]] 19:00, 14 June 2012 (EDT)
:::Liam, what are your thoughts on the information I added relating to atheism websites? [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 23:41, 14 June 2012 (EDT)
:::Liam, what are your thoughts on the information I added relating to atheism websites? [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 23:41, 14 June 2012 (EDT)
For an article called "Atheist leaders and immoral relationships", it is shockingly low on atheist leaders in immoral relationships. Are we all allowed to create articles like this and claim that the "leadership" of a group does something, as long as someone, ''somewhere'', practices that behavior?
On more of a style point, could you point out any significant difference between this article and [[Internet_atheism_and_polyamory]]?
[[User:EricAlstrom|EricAlstrom]] 08:43, 15 June 2012 (EDT)