Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,140
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 46:
Line 46: +
Debate: U.S. Supreme Court ruling on ObamaCare: a proper ruling? (view source)
Revision as of 09:13, June 29, 2012
, 09:13, June 29, 2012→Brace yourself for the backlash Democrats: It's coming!
:I would be amazed if Republicans managed to do as much as repeal a tiny portion of the ACA, even if they win control over the Senate in November. There isn't the remotest chance that they will gain a filibuster-proof majority, (not with lackluster Romney at the top of the ticket) and given the amount of stalling and blocking the Republicans have engaged in these past few years, I suspect that the Democrats will be more than ready to repay them in kind.
:I would be amazed if Republicans managed to do as much as repeal a tiny portion of the ACA, even if they win control over the Senate in November. There isn't the remotest chance that they will gain a filibuster-proof majority, (not with lackluster Romney at the top of the ticket) and given the amount of stalling and blocking the Republicans have engaged in these past few years, I suspect that the Democrats will be more than ready to repay them in kind.
:The problem with government gridlock, of which many Americans seem to approve, is that it's just as difficult to repeal legislation something as it is to pass it in the first place.[[User:MarkJW|MarkJW]] 00:13, 29 June 2012 (EDT)
:The problem with government gridlock, of which many Americans seem to approve, is that it's just as difficult to repeal legislation something as it is to pass it in the first place.[[User:MarkJW|MarkJW]] 00:13, 29 June 2012 (EDT)
::Through economic necessity, every aspect of liberalism which requires public funds is going to be fair game in the USA. What is happening in Greece, Spain, Italy and Ireland will come to USA sooner or later. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 05:13, 29 June 2012 (EDT)