Changes

#In response to surveys showing that only 10%-13% of Wikipedia editors are women, the Wikimedia Foundation established a "Gender Gap email list" to discuss how to encourage more women to participate as editors. It was proposed that the email list be split into two section, one for women and transgendered and another for their male allies.<ref>http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/gendergap/2011-March/000770.html</ref>  When the Deputy Director of the Wikimedia Foundation questioned the wisdom of the proposal,<ref>http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/gendergap/2011-March/000817.html</ref> he was denounced as "sexist."

#In response to surveys showing that only 10%-13% of Wikipedia editors are women, the Wikimedia Foundation established a "Gender Gap email list" to discuss how to encourage more women to participate as editors. It was proposed that the email list be split into two section, one for women and transgendered and another for their male allies.<ref>http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/gendergap/2011-March/000770.html</ref>  When the Deputy Director of the Wikimedia Foundation questioned the wisdom of the proposal,<ref>http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/gendergap/2011-March/000817.html</ref> he was denounced as "sexist."

#The same radical feminists who wrote "Netball and the Olympic Movement" have virtually the same biased material in the article [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women%27s_sport_at_the_Olympics Women's sports at the Olympics].

#The same radical feminists who wrote "Netball and the Olympic Movement" have virtually the same biased material in the article [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women%27s_sport_at_the_Olympics Women's sports at the Olympics].

#The Wikipedia article [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Status_of_Women_Canada Minister responsible for the Status of Women (Canada)] is extremely superficial and makes only a quick mention of the slander lawsuit that the government agency lost in 2003.

#The Wikipedia article [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Status_of_Women_Canada Minister responsible for the Status of Women (Canada)] is extremely superficial and makes only a quick mention of the slander lawsuit that the government agency lost in 2003 against the creator of the "BC Fathers" website that provides information for fathers in custody disputes.<ref>[http://www.courts.gov.bc.ca/Jdb-txt/SC/08/02/2008BCSC0249.htm ''Wiebe v. Bouchard''] Supreme Court of British Columbia, 2008 BCSC 249 (March 11, 2008) Retreived June 29, 2012.</ref>

== References ==

== References ==