Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit, rollback
6,613
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 12:
Line 12: + + +
Debate:Do agnostics have proof and evidence that agnosticism is valid? (view source)
Revision as of 12:35, July 4, 2012
, 12:35, July 4, 2012cats
:''adj.'' '''1.''' Well grounded; just. ... '''4.''' ''Logic'' '''a.''' Containing premises from which the conclusion may logically be derived. '''b.''' Correctly inferred or deduced from a premise.
:''adj.'' '''1.''' Well grounded; just. ... '''4.''' ''Logic'' '''a.''' Containing premises from which the conclusion may logically be derived. '''b.''' Correctly inferred or deduced from a premise.
Because agnosticism is the belief that there is no proof of God's existence, it makes no sense to me to ask them for proof or evidence of their skepticism. [[User:GregG|GregG]] 17:14, 29 June 2012 (EDT)
Because agnosticism is the belief that there is no proof of God's existence, it makes no sense to me to ask them for proof or evidence of their skepticism. [[User:GregG|GregG]] 17:14, 29 June 2012 (EDT)
[[Category:Epistemology]]
[[Category:Debate]]
[[Category:Agnosticism]]