953
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 151:
Line 151: + +
→Risk factors
Your posting above is false and misleading. The Lancet entry, for example, is not a study at all. I doubt many of the others are either. Virtually all statistically significant studies have shown an increase risked, as does logic. The increased risk was shown before abortion became politically controversial and before the abortion industry became so powerful.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 23:28, 10 April 2007 (EDT)
Your posting above is false and misleading. The Lancet entry, for example, is not a study at all. I doubt many of the others are either. Virtually all statistically significant studies have shown an increase risked, as does logic. The increased risk was shown before abortion became politically controversial and before the abortion industry became so powerful.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 23:28, 10 April 2007 (EDT)
:The Lancet article is indeed a study, though it is regarding ovarian cancer, not breast. My mistake. But you don't understand what statistical significance means. The majority of studies (ie, those in my list) were not statistically significant, meaning they found no effect of abortion on breast cancer. That doesn't mean they don't count. [[User:Murray|Murray]] 02:07, 11 April 2007 (EDT)
== Blocking ==
== Blocking ==