Changes

::I created this page. It is not a "troll/parody" of "Gallery of obese atheists". It's a demonstration that if one is valid here, the other is too; and, I hope, that ''neither'' is valid. They're both stupid. [[User:CasparRH|CasparRH]] 21:52, 14 July 2012 (EDT)

::I created this page. It is not a "troll/parody" of "Gallery of obese atheists". It's a demonstration that if one is valid here, the other is too; and, I hope, that ''neither'' is valid. They're both stupid. [[User:CasparRH|CasparRH]] 21:52, 14 July 2012 (EDT)

:::However well-intentioned, this grandstanding on article pages seems inconsistent with Conservapedia's mission of building a trustworthy encyclopedia.  [[User:GregG|GregG]] 23:56, 14 July 2012 (EDT)

:::However well-intentioned, this grandstanding on article pages seems inconsistent with Conservapedia's mission of building a trustworthy encyclopedia.  [[User:GregG|GregG]] 23:56, 14 July 2012 (EDT)

::::I think both pages should be deleted.  They are insulting, petty, inconsequential and highly unencyclopedic.  They are hurtful and dismissive of both overweight people and atheists(or christians).  I don't believe that this sort of content should be on any website that uses the words 'trustworthy' or 'encyclopedia' in its name (there is a lot of other stuff like that here but I mean that ideally there shouldn't)[[User:Cmurphynz|Cmurphynz]] 05:27, 15 July 2012 (EDT)

::::I think both pages should be deleted.  They are insulting, petty, inconsequential and highly unencyclopedic.  They are hurtful and dismissive of both overweight people and atheists(or christians).  I don't believe that this sort of content should be on any website that uses the words 'trustworthy' or 'encyclopedia' in its name (there is a lot of other stuff like that here but I mean that ideally there shouldn't)[[User:Cmurphynz|Cmurphynz]] 05:27, 15 July 2012 (EDT)

::Are you saying that anything put up by an established administrator is, ipso facto, appropriate and worthwhile? [[User:CasparRH|CasparRH]] 16:23, 15 July 2012 (EDT)

::Are you saying that anything put up by an established administrator is, ipso facto, appropriate and worthwhile? [[User:CasparRH|CasparRH]] 16:23, 15 July 2012 (EDT)

:::Most likely, since they're most familiar with site policy. I see you just created another parody article. These are really not necessary. Please cease the nonsense: I see you made good contributions and that's why I only placed a 10 minute sanction on your account. --[[User:JamesWilson|James Wilson]] 16:57, 15 July 2012 (EDT)

:::Most likely, since they're most familiar with site policy. I see you just created another parody article. These are really not necessary. Please cease the nonsense: I see you made good contributions and that's why I only placed a 10 minute sanction on your account. --[[User:JamesWilson|James Wilson]] 16:57, 15 July 2012 (EDT)