Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
524 bytes added ,  07:18, July 22, 2012
no edit summary
Line 20: Line 20:  
:It has to be mentioned. In a 5 or 600 word article like this though, why go into it in any depth. (The same can be said of [[William Rufus]] and [[Richard I]]. Both of those two could be called "jocks" in its American college sense of the word, who preferred the rough companionship of the field and dressing room to the company of ladies but that's just my thoughts from 50-odd years of reading this stuff. They might have been gay.) One of the reasons for Edward's downfall was the perception amongst the barons of his lack of "manhood" in its chivalric sense of the time. That may not mean he was gay but his friendship and patronage of Gaveston and the younger Despenser especially gave a certain impression. Isabella may have borne him 4 kids but all that means he fulfilled his royal duty. And Isobella's taking up with Mortimer encourages the impression that he was not quite up to it as a male. But to go into this in an article of this size would make it so unbalanced that I you would have to go more deeply into other things - the struggle over Gaveston with Thomas of Lancaster and the wrangling over the Gloucester estate - all very boring stuff and not really needed in an article aimed at teenagers. That he was most like gay or bisexual would not be important enough for a 300 worder, and would be worthy of discussion in a 2500 assignment but in something the size of this article I think it should be mentioned but not made a matter of importance.
 
:It has to be mentioned. In a 5 or 600 word article like this though, why go into it in any depth. (The same can be said of [[William Rufus]] and [[Richard I]]. Both of those two could be called "jocks" in its American college sense of the word, who preferred the rough companionship of the field and dressing room to the company of ladies but that's just my thoughts from 50-odd years of reading this stuff. They might have been gay.) One of the reasons for Edward's downfall was the perception amongst the barons of his lack of "manhood" in its chivalric sense of the time. That may not mean he was gay but his friendship and patronage of Gaveston and the younger Despenser especially gave a certain impression. Isabella may have borne him 4 kids but all that means he fulfilled his royal duty. And Isobella's taking up with Mortimer encourages the impression that he was not quite up to it as a male. But to go into this in an article of this size would make it so unbalanced that I you would have to go more deeply into other things - the struggle over Gaveston with Thomas of Lancaster and the wrangling over the Gloucester estate - all very boring stuff and not really needed in an article aimed at teenagers. That he was most like gay or bisexual would not be important enough for a 300 worder, and would be worthy of discussion in a 2500 assignment but in something the size of this article I think it should be mentioned but not made a matter of importance.
 
:It's a matter of choice really. [[User:AlanE|AlanE]] 02:25, 22 July 2012 (EDT)
 
:It's a matter of choice really. [[User:AlanE|AlanE]] 02:25, 22 July 2012 (EDT)
 +
::I guess I agree with you, except for the part about any of it being boring.  Edward II's reign was anything but boring.  I also agree that there isn't actually anything concrete that paints him as gay, just a whole lot of supposition, and a lot of it coming from his enemies.  I suggest that CMurphy should have a go and add what he thinks appropriate and if it is not good we can edit or even remove it.  After all, it just takes a click of a button to revert.  --[[User:DamianJohn|DamianJohn]] 03:18, 22 July 2012 (EDT)
Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit, rollback
907

edits

Navigation menu