| Line 27: |
Line 27: |
| | 15 questions for evolutionists of the Question Evolution! Campaign. He obviously cannot satisfactorily answer the 15 questions.<ref>[http://questionevolution.blogspot.com/2012/07/why-does-richard-dawkins-have-such-high.html Why does Richard Dawkins have such a high belief in the possibility of fairies being at the bottom of the garden?]</ref>}} | | 15 questions for evolutionists of the Question Evolution! Campaign. He obviously cannot satisfactorily answer the 15 questions.<ref>[http://questionevolution.blogspot.com/2012/07/why-does-richard-dawkins-have-such-high.html Why does Richard Dawkins have such a high belief in the possibility of fairies being at the bottom of the garden?]</ref>}} |
| | | | |
| − | == Publisher's notice of his upcoming book and the issue of inconsistency and flip-flopping == | + | === Publisher's notice of his upcoming book and the issue of inconsistency and flip-flopping === |
| | | | |
| | In June of 2012, the ''Christian'' Post reported: | | In June of 2012, the ''Christian'' Post reported: |
| Line 38: |
Line 38: |
| | {{cquote|The publisher's notice of the upcoming book using the term "atheist" can be found on several other prominent internet properties besides the ''Christian Post'' such as ''Publishers Weekly'', ''The Blaze,'' ''Christianity Today'' and ''Galleycat'' (''Galleycat'' is on the Media Bistro domain). | | {{cquote|The publisher's notice of the upcoming book using the term "atheist" can be found on several other prominent internet properties besides the ''Christian Post'' such as ''Publishers Weekly'', ''The Blaze,'' ''Christianity Today'' and ''Galleycat'' (''Galleycat'' is on the Media Bistro domain). |
| | | | |
| − | First, Richard Dawkins has gone from being a militant atheist to being an agnostic. | + | First, Richard Dawkins has gone from being [http://www.ted.com/talks/richard_dawkins_on_militant_atheism.html a militant atheist] to being [http://voxday.blogspot.com/2012/02/mailvox-richard-dawkins-is-not-atheist.html an agnostic]. |
| | | | |
| − | Vox Day wrote about Dawkins' inconsistency when it comes to the issues of atheism and agnosticism... | + | Vox Day [http://voxday.blogspot.com/2012/02/mailvox-richard-dawkins-is-not-atheist.html wrote] about Dawkins' inconsistency when it comes to the issues of atheism and agnosticism... |
| | | | |
| | Christians should call Dawkins on his disingenuous [[Flip-flop (politics)|flip-flopping]] if his publisher continues to promote the book as a book focusing on his journey to atheism without mentioning the fact that Dawkins is presently an agnostic who has rejected atheism. | | Christians should call Dawkins on his disingenuous [[Flip-flop (politics)|flip-flopping]] if his publisher continues to promote the book as a book focusing on his journey to atheism without mentioning the fact that Dawkins is presently an agnostic who has rejected atheism. |
| Line 47: |
Line 47: |
| | | | |
| | Given the weakness of his argumentation and the vitriol which often accompanies it, I agree with Dr. Don Batten that the weight of the evidence points to Dawkins being a God-hater.<ref>[http://questionevolution.blogspot.com/2012/07/atheism-is-rudderless-and-unseaworthy.html Atheism is rudderless and unseaworthy]</ref>}} | | Given the weakness of his argumentation and the vitriol which often accompanies it, I agree with Dr. Don Batten that the weight of the evidence points to Dawkins being a God-hater.<ref>[http://questionevolution.blogspot.com/2012/07/atheism-is-rudderless-and-unseaworthy.html Atheism is rudderless and unseaworthy]</ref>}} |
| − |
| |
| | | | |
| | == Ben Stein interview with Richard Dawkins revealed Dawkins to be an agnostic/weak atheist == | | == Ben Stein interview with Richard Dawkins revealed Dawkins to be an agnostic/weak atheist == |