SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
1,134
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 124:
Line 124: + +
Debate:Is the evidence in favor of evolution convincing? (view source)
Revision as of 13:27, July 25, 2012
, 13:27, July 25, 2012→No, It's Not
==No, It's Not==
==No, It's Not==
A lot of the evidence used for Evolution in fact supports Microevolution, but not Macro. The fossil record completely contradicts Evolutionary theory, which is why the theory of [[Punctuated Equilibrium]] was proposed. Numerous [[Recent_controversy_in_hominid_ancestry|fossil finds]] over the past decade contradict gradualistic Evolutionary theory, like Ardipithecus ramidus (Ardi), Sahelanthropus tchadensis, Orrorin tugenensis, as well as discoveries that numerous ancestors coexisted, most notably Erectus and Habilis and Ramidus and Afaransis. Furthermore, [[Microevolution#Rapid_Rates|rapid Microevolution rates]] are strong indication that the vast time frames hypothesized by evolutionists are in fact wrong, since Microevolution occurring over decades rather than millions of years is not compatible with conventional Evolutionary theory. --[[User:Jzyehoshua|Joshua Zambrano]] 09:22, 25 July 2012 (EDT)
A lot of the evidence used for Evolution in fact supports Microevolution, but not Macro. The fossil record completely contradicts Evolutionary theory, which is why the theory of [[Punctuated Equilibrium]] was proposed. Numerous [[Recent_controversy_in_hominid_ancestry|fossil finds]] over the past decade contradict gradualistic Evolutionary theory, like Ardipithecus ramidus (Ardi), Sahelanthropus tchadensis, Orrorin tugenensis, as well as discoveries that numerous ancestors coexisted, most notably Erectus and Habilis and Ramidus and Afaransis. Furthermore, [[Microevolution#Rapid_Rates|rapid Microevolution rates]] are strong indication that the vast time frames hypothesized by evolutionists are in fact wrong, since Microevolution occurring over decades rather than millions of years is not compatible with conventional Evolutionary theory. --[[User:Jzyehoshua|Joshua Zambrano]] 09:22, 25 July 2012 (EDT)
The following are just a few of the places on the web I've debated with Evolutionists over the past year. I find their arguments unconvincing.[http://ra.tionalwiki.org/wiki/Talk:Evidence_against_a_recent_creation#Evidence_for_a_recent_creation] See here[http://www.evcforum.net/dm.php?control=page&t=14555&mpp=15&p=11] for an example at EVCForum.net where Dr. Adequate, a defender of Evolution, bragged that after 2 years no Creationists would accept his challenge to a debate. I presented my evidence, offered to debate him, and he promptly backed out and said I wasn't allowed to present evidence for my side. --[[User:Jzyehoshua|Joshua Zambrano]] 09:27, 25 July 2012 (EDT)