Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 136: Line 136:  
Before anyone admonishes me for asking these questions, I'd like to point out that I have not disclosed a single personal opinion in the above post, as I don't think they're relevant to my point. [[User:LucoDaw|LucoDaw]] 23:06, 5 July 2012 (EDT)
 
Before anyone admonishes me for asking these questions, I'd like to point out that I have not disclosed a single personal opinion in the above post, as I don't think they're relevant to my point. [[User:LucoDaw|LucoDaw]] 23:06, 5 July 2012 (EDT)
 
:LocoDaw, considering I have evidence of you removing one of my additions to Conservapedia's [[Christian apologetics]] article (see: http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Christian_apologetics&diff=prev&oldid=993002 ), I find your complaint about wanting more Christian content at Conservapedia rather odd. By the way, I reverted your censorship. Also, if you are concerned with the lack of more Christian content at Conservapedia why haven't your edits reflected this. I don't see you creating a lot of Christian content. Needless to say, you leave yourself wide open to the charge of hypocrisy. I thought there was a shortage of well referenced online material dealing with atheism and atheist figures in a fairly comprehensive manner on the internet which was not very low quality content (like most content written by atheists exhibits). So I created some content. Judging by the amount of views to my atheism related content, my theory about this shortage was confirmed. Since this time, some of the shortage has been alleviated as this article was created [http://creation.com/atheism atheism] and this resource was created: [http://www.truefreethinker.com/tag/atheism Atheism]  
 
:LocoDaw, considering I have evidence of you removing one of my additions to Conservapedia's [[Christian apologetics]] article (see: http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Christian_apologetics&diff=prev&oldid=993002 ), I find your complaint about wanting more Christian content at Conservapedia rather odd. By the way, I reverted your censorship. Also, if you are concerned with the lack of more Christian content at Conservapedia why haven't your edits reflected this. I don't see you creating a lot of Christian content. Needless to say, you leave yourself wide open to the charge of hypocrisy. I thought there was a shortage of well referenced online material dealing with atheism and atheist figures in a fairly comprehensive manner on the internet which was not very low quality content (like most content written by atheists exhibits). So I created some content. Judging by the amount of views to my atheism related content, my theory about this shortage was confirmed. Since this time, some of the shortage has been alleviated as this article was created [http://creation.com/atheism atheism] and this resource was created: [http://www.truefreethinker.com/tag/atheism Atheism]  
 
+
[[File:Shmuley Boteach.jpg|thumbnail|150px|right|Shmuley Boteach beat Richard Dawkins in a debate according to the student audience. Despite the fact that the debate occurred, Dawkins embarrassed himself by cowardly denying such a debate occurred. See: [[Richard Dawkins and Rabbi Shmuley Boteach]]
 +
<br />
 +
<br />
 +
<small>(see [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:RebShmuley.jpg license agreement])</small> ]]
 
:As far as the article length, you really haven't made a convincing case that any of the material is irrelevant. For example, [[Daniel Came]], an Oxford atheist, recently commented on the issue of Dawkins and cowardice. See: [[Atheism and cowardice]] So have [[William Lane Craig]] and [[Dinesh D'Souza]].  Rabbi Boteach who beat Dawkins in his first debate mentions that Dawkins has not agreed to a second debate. By the way, Dawkins denial that the video taped Boteach debate occurred was a total disgrace and a cowards way of not dealing with a debate he lost. According to the college student audience he lost the Boteach debate. For details see: [[Richard Dawkins and Rabbi Shmuley Boteach]]
 
:As far as the article length, you really haven't made a convincing case that any of the material is irrelevant. For example, [[Daniel Came]], an Oxford atheist, recently commented on the issue of Dawkins and cowardice. See: [[Atheism and cowardice]] So have [[William Lane Craig]] and [[Dinesh D'Souza]].  Rabbi Boteach who beat Dawkins in his first debate mentions that Dawkins has not agreed to a second debate. By the way, Dawkins denial that the video taped Boteach debate occurred was a total disgrace and a cowards way of not dealing with a debate he lost. According to the college student audience he lost the Boteach debate. For details see: [[Richard Dawkins and Rabbi Shmuley Boteach]]
  
Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
350,916

edits

Navigation menu