Changes

This was previously at Blogger.com[http://jzyehoshua1.blogspot.com/2009/08/obama-v-obama-on-abortion-in-health.html] and still appears in Google search results[http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&q=jzyehoshua+blogger], but apparently Google took it down for some reason. Therefore, I'll just put it back up here. It shows the level of bias ongoing at the page for Obama, and how intent Wikipedia is on suppressing the evidence and sources I provided at the Obama page here. The same content [[Obama_born_alive_controversy|I provided here]]] I was willing to have summarized in just a few well-sourced sentences on the Obama page, and not even in the Lede, yet editors there fought this tooth and nail, and did not even want it discussed; doing all they could to get me banned. How Google is involved with the Barack Obama campaign I'm not sure but it's growing apparent they too want the information suppressed, and actually tampered with my ability to access Google News results - I had to alter individual results to prevent them from changing my access to the search feature for it in recent months. Here's the former entry I had on Blogger - I'm adding subsections for comments 1-10, 11-20, etc., for ease in editing:

This was previously at Blogger.com[http://jzyehoshua1.blogspot.com/2009/08/obama-v-obama-on-abortion-in-health.html] and still appears in Google search results[http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&q=jzyehoshua+blogger], but apparently Google took it down for some reason. Therefore, I'll just put it back up here. It shows the level of bias ongoing at the page for Obama, and how intent Wikipedia is on suppressing the evidence and sources I provided at the Obama page (see section [[User:Jzyehoshua/WhyILeftWikipedia#First:_17_Sources,_Proposed_Changes|First: 17 Sources, Proposed Changes]]). The same content [[Obama_born_alive_controversy|I provided here]] I was willing to have summarized in just a few well-sourced sentences on the Obama page, and not even in the Lede, yet editors there fought this tooth and nail, and did not even want it discussed; doing all they could to get me banned. How Google is involved with the Barack Obama campaign I'm not sure but it's growing apparent they too want the information suppressed, and actually tampered with my ability to access Google News results - I had to alter individual results to prevent them from changing my access to the search feature for it in recent months. Here's the former entry I had on Blogger - I'm adding subsections for comments 1-10, 11-20, etc., for ease in editing:

==Wikipedia Controversy: Bias on Born Alive Bills with Obama==

==Wikipedia Controversy: Bias on Born Alive Bills with Obama==

=== Result ===

=== Result ===

(THIS IS NEW MATERIAL NOT PREVIOUSLY IN THE FORMER BLOG ENTRY)

(THIS IS NEW MATERIAL NOT PREVIOUSLY IN THE FORMER BLOG ENTRY)

After the above two discussions, the discussions were closed via hab tags to prevent others from seeing them, and attempts to restore the discussions and continue them - just as they'd been beginning to bear fruit I might add - were reverted via edit wars by multiple users, including Administrator Frank. I then brought it up for AN/I dispute and asked why the discussions were closed on the page, resulting in the following discussion (which also got closed). As seen from the following source, every single thread was getting closed to try and prevent discussion and people from seeing what the sources/evidence I was providing were. Frank as soon as he realized it was going to be seen by administration began archiving all the discussions and closing whatever else he could to try and cover up what was going on. They got me banned, and months later, when it expired, I refused to drop it, promptly bringing it up once again on the Talk Page, and asking them to ban me, since I didn't want to be a part of Wikipedia like that.  

After the above two discussions, the discussions were closed via hab tags to prevent others from seeing them, and attempts to restore the discussions and continue them - just as they'd been beginning to bear fruit I might add - were reverted via edit wars by multiple users, including Administrator Frank. I then brought it up for AN/I dispute[[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring]] and asked why the discussions were closed on the page, resulting in the following discussion (which also got closed). As seen from the following source, every single thread was getting closed to try and prevent discussion and people from seeing what the sources/evidence I was providing were. Frank as soon as he realized it was going to be seen by administration began archiving all the discussions and closing whatever else he could to try and cover up what was going on. They got me banned, and months later, when it expired, I refused to drop it, promptly bringing it up once again on the Talk Page, and asking them to ban me, since I didn't want to be a part of Wikipedia like that.  

[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Barack_Obama&oldid=334923784#Attempt_to_Resolve_Edit_War Source]

[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Barack_Obama&oldid=334923784#Attempt_to_Resolve_Edit_War Source]