8
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
describing my edits to this evolution-biased article
Will add more to this. Currently heading home for the day.--[[User:Tims|TimS]] 17:05, 11 May 2007 (EDT)
Will add more to this. Currently heading home for the day.--[[User:Tims|TimS]] 17:05, 11 May 2007 (EDT)
Hi there, I'm concerned about the implicit support here for the unproven and frankly morally corrupt theory of evolution on this page. The opening paragraph, and especially the picture, suggest to the reader that living animals of completely different species are related to each other by direct ancestry.
The image at http://conservapedia.com/File:Cladogram.gif falsely claims that fish, lizards, mice and cats all have the same ancestor, when in fact, it specifically states in the Bible, "[a]nd God said, Let the waters bring forth abundantly the moving creature that hath life, and fowl that may fly above the earth in the open firmament of heaven." (Genesis 1:20)
and, "[a]nd God said, Let the earth bring forth the living creature after his kind, cattle, and creeping thing, and beast of the earth after his kind: and it was so." (Genesis 1:24).
Clearly hagfish and perch (beasts of the water) and lizards, mice and cats (creeping things and beasts of the Earth) were first created by God on seperate days, they did not magically transform from a common ancestor, an idea which I think you will agree is preposterous.
What's worse, this central point of the evolutionary agenda is just presented as fact. Surely this is the kind of godless liberal bias which should be avoided.
I have therefore undertaken to alter this article a bit to at least include the possible debate from a Biblical perspective which is in keeping with strong Christian Conservative values.
Any queries or criticisms please address on the talk page.
[[User:BiblicalGent|BiblicalGent]] 01:42, 8 August 2012 (EDT)