Stephen Boissoin
Stephen Boissoin is a youth pastor who was, in line with instructions "remaining opponents ... must be vilified" given in the LGBTI sort of 'Mein Kampf' called 'After the Ball', subject of attack by 'gay' pressure group due to his views on homosexuality.
LGBTI inquisition against Boissoin
In his 2002 letter to the editor of the Red Deer Advocate, Boissoin described homosexuality alias sodomy as immoral, physically dangerous and thus supposed to be devoid of public support for promotion in schools. This was in accordance with observation obtained through scientific device of thought experiment. Several weeks later, a self-declared 'homosexual' was physically beaten by a thug. Shortly after, the 'gay' acitivists who have been struggling to get rid of legitimite opposition to their immoral behavior, orchastrated a 'case' against Boissoin in the Alberta so called 'Human Rights Tribunal'. By adopting non sequitur fallalacy, Boissoin was found guilty of writing a letter that the tribunal deemed was likely to expose so called 'gays' to hatred and contempt. Lori Andreachuk, who led the tribunal’s inquisition against Boissoin, said: “I find that there is a circumstantial connection between the hate speech of Mr. Boissoin and the CCC and the beating of a gay teenager in Red Deer less than two weeks following the publication of Mr. Boissoin’s letter.” The problem is, the tribunal never heard evidence connecting Boissoin’s letter to the actions of the violent criminal. But in a human rights tribunal, proof is in the eye of the offendee and circumstantial evidence is enough to convict.”[1] Disturbed characters tend to play the victim role (cf. "Portray gays as victims, not as aggressive challengers" in After the Ball) and then vilify the real victims[2] , for example, with labeling latter ones as “homophobic” or ascribing the 'hate speech' to them instead of admitting the legitimate criticism.[1]
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Scott Lively (2009). Redeeming the Rainbow: A Christian Response to the "Gay" Agenda, 1 (Version 1.1), Veritas Aeterna Press, 50-6.
- ↑ George Simon (March 23, 2009). Vilifying the Victim: Manipulating You by Making You Feel Like the Bad Guy. CounsellingResource.com. Retrieved on 30 April 2016. “Neurotics hate to think of themselves as the injuring party and would rather carry the burden of abuse than see themselves as an abuser. Disturbed characters know this well. So, when they want to take advantage, a good one-two punch is to play the victim and then vilify the real victim. I’ve been posting a series of articles on behaviors commonly displayed by persons with disturbances of character. These behaviors often serve to reinforce the disturbed character’s resistance to accepting social norms and responsibility, as well as serving as vehicles of manipulation and impression-management. In a prior post, I explained the tactic of “Playing the Victim.” (See “Playing the Victim”.) A related tactic sometimes used in combination with the tactic of playing the victim is the tactic of vilifying the victim.”