Talk:Biblical accuracy

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Re:Luke. He was a good historian because he wrote about his contemporary time? Lolwut? HDCase 11:16, 30 October 2008 (EDT)

  • Writing about the time that one knows is not a guarantee of being accurate.
  • Many have disputed that the Bible was accurate, so Luke's accuracy is a valid point to make.
  • Most if not all of the Bible was written by contemporaries. So you'd agree that the entire Bible is accurate? (I do).
Philip J. Rayment 22:30, 30 October 2008 (EDT)

Is this article more about Biblical inerrancy, as opposed to accuracy? I think so, but maybe there's something here that's too subtle for me. Wouldn't be the first time! -- Martib 22:51, 30 October 2008 (EDT)

Inerrancy is the theological concept that they Bible must be without error, being God's revelation.
This article is about the evidence that the Bible is a very accurate historical record.
Does that clarify it for you?
Philip J. Rayment 02:09, 31 October 2008 (EDT)
Yes, thanks Philip.--Martib 11:25, 31 October 2008 (EDT)

Potential things to add

These links might be good to add, if anyone gets the time to incorporate them into this article or another one: [1][2] --1990'sguy (talk) 22:19, 11 February 2018 (EST)