Talk:Essay:Identity, democratic polity and the writing of reliable articles
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
I generally agree with you when you write
| “ | Indeed, we may have to make a special policy for scientific controversies - which goes beyond or is an extension of "NPOV". Something like, Any claim to be "science" must adhere to the scientific method by (1) showing how the theory is related to actual observations and (2) specifying at least one derived hypothesis which could possibly be falsified by the discovery of facts which contradict it. Claims which do not fit this schema would simply be treated the same as political or historical claims: "he said vs. she said". | ” |
HeartOfGold 15:03, 18 May 2007 (EDT)