Talk:Essay:Which POV is the best?

Perhaps the word "best" is problematic; CP has a bias, and we wear it on our sleeve, RW is in over its head, and WP is just a lying sack of doo-doo if it or anybody thinks it's neutral. Try it again with, Which project best meets its goals? or Which project is more honest in its objectives?

If you believe anybody or anything is unbiased, you probably believe in Sants Clause and the Tooth Fairy, too. RobS^{Give Peace a chance} 03:16, March 5, 2023 (EST)

RobS See the follow-up questions. It seems to remain neutral on the topic, saying each website has its benefits and drawbacks. ChenXiansheng (talk) 20:25, March 5, 2023 (EST)

Thank you, that was very helpful. In reading those responses, it's fairly obvious ChatGPT draws much on Wikipedia's database for its alleged "intelligence". But ultimately, ChatGPT reveals its own bias here: "Ultimately, it's up to each individual to evaluate these projects and determine....". Note: "individual" and not "collective". Seems ChatGPT has a rather conservative bias, and not a socialist collective bias as RW & WP promote. RobS^{Give Peace a chance} 14:34, March 6, 2023 (EST)

Two other notes: (1) while we're on the subject of honesty, ChatGPT claims Wikipedia's goal is to create "a free encyclopedia that anyone can edit" - except those skeptics and conservatives that have been banned; (2) ChatGPT's algorithms apparently have been programmed to say "critical eye" for the second question, as the phrase is used to criticize all three wikis. My critical eye tells me ChatGPT is not being honest in its evaluation and promotion of Wikipedia. RobS^{Give Peace a chance} 20:43, March 6, 2023 (EST)