Talk:Gravitation demystified

Hi JimJast, I think you would be better to rename this to "Essay:Gravitation demystified". Ask an administrator if they would do that for you. Maratrean 20:50, 15 July 2011 (EDT)

Hi Maratrean, how do I ask administrator about anything in general and the thing above in particular? JimJast 11:49, 16 July 2011 (EDT)

I also noticed that CP is much better than WP in gravitation though for some reason they didn't notice neither Einsteinian mechanism nor its quantum properties coming from this Einsteinian mechanism. JimJast 18:12, 2 August 2011 (EDT)

Hi JimJast, there is a reason why the mechanism you illustrated is not cited in WP. The reason is that you have only written a tautology: in (4) you used F=ma, which is eq. (5), to obtain (5) (by the way, F=ma is incompatibile with E=mc²). --MM87 15:40, 9 August 2011 (EDT)

p.s. or, at least, you confused I don't understand the connection between the speed of light, the Lorentz factor and the speed of the particle in the "rocket equation" (3). Could you explain it better?

Hi Mateo, I sent a long letter to address <mateo.mori87@gmail.com> in which I explained what I don't understand in your questions. The letter bouced, so I still don't know how much better you want me to explain things which I could if I understood the problem. Either sent me a better address or specify the questions better. JimJast 14:25, 10 August 2011 (EDT)

You have to correct the e-mail address, there is a double 't' :D --MM87 14:39, 10 August 2011 (EDT)

OK Matteo, I noced it too :) and I re-sent the letter already. So now I just wait for your response. JimJast 14:47, 10 August 2011 (EDT)