From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Dogma is not subject to reason, otherwise you would have only rational religion, which would be incompatible with the very concept of divine revelation and much else that I understand to be central to religion. The point of my edit was to stress the distinction between matters of mere fact and questions of faith where facts are not enough. Sorry if that wasn't clear.WFN 19:03, 26 March 2007 (EDT)