Talk:Richard Dawkins' Elevatorgate comments

While the notability of the 'elevatorgate' incident is questionable enough, there is certainly no need to go making an entirely separate article about the comments made by Richard Dawkins about it. DavidZa 21:37, 24 September 2011 (EDT)

Are you a fan of Richard Dawkins? Could this be influencing your decision to not want Dawkins remarks' highlighted? Skeptic David Allen Green is of the opinion that the Elevatorgate scandal was notable. Plus, it was covered by some major press outlets. Lastly, I do think it is easier for the reader to not have to read the entire initial comments and then Dawkins subsequent explanation which made things worse in the main article. At the same time, I think it is important to make the comments easily available and a significant amount of people have viewed the page so far. Conservative 21:46, 24 September 2011 (EDT)

No, I think he just means it looks dumb. You'd do better to consolidate the two, and give a unified narrative of the incident.--AlexanderD 22:22, 24 September 2011 (EDT)

Gentlemen, why don't you create your first Conservapedia articles and show me how it's done. I would like to learn from the masters. :) Conservative 23:38, 24 September 2011 (EDT)

Suit yourself, I guess..--AlexanderD 01:04, 25 September 2011 (EDT)

Nominate for Merge

I think this should be merged into the Elevatorgate article. The main article would make more sense with this information in there and having two articles on exactly the same thing is a waste of time. --DonauKind 21:28, 16 February 2012 (EST)