Talk:Rickets

This article is based entirely on http://www.nlm.nih.gov/MEDLINEPLUS/ency/article/000344.htm without attribution. It does not represent a direct quote, as some words have been changed. What is the best way to note the source of the material? -- 01:17, 6 October 2008 Brossa

I've taken a stab at it. It is unacceptable to copy so much word-for-word from one source, so a good chunk of it had to be removed. In addition, some of it didn't even make sense because of errors in formatting the copied material. Rather than putting quotation marks around each section, another approach would be to put ... where information has been left out. I chose the first approach as the individual sentences are likely to become separated as information from other sources is added to the article. --Hsmom 09:24, 6 October 2008 (EDT)