Talk:Starvation

Reference source

Isn't that source a little iffy? If we cannot accept about.com, then why should we accept answers.yahoo.com which is highly based on user contribution (like Wikipedia)? o_0 Fuzzy|AFD 15:19, 18 April 2008 (EDT)

I'm inclined to agree with you there Fuzzy. BrianCo 15:34, 18 April 2008 (EDT)

I thought it was better than no reference at all. Your choices at this point are to delete the information, or to find a better source. Take your pick. --Ed Poor ^Talk 15:37, 18 April 2008 (EDT)

So, I guess only you can do that? o_0 Fuzzy|AFD 16:13, 18 April 2008 (EDT)

Ed I'm sorry if I offended you (you sound a little peeved) but I hadn't checked the edit history. However, knowing of your experience of wiki's, general all-round experience with computers and the internet, and overall rigor in substantiating claims, then I would have expected you to have come up with something more authorative. But since you've handed out an assignment I'll have a look round for something better, unless you can beat me to it. :) BrianCo 16:46, 18 April 2008 (EDT)