From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Almost this entire article was copied, originally word-for-word, from Copying another person's words, without their permission, without attribution, is deceitful. It is unfortunate that removing the plagiarism reduces the article's length; it will have to be built up again with honest research. Hsmom 23:34, 20 May 2010 (EDT)

What in this[1] has anything to do with the evolution of the woodpeckers skull? I know it touches on irreducible complexity, but on it's own I don't have anything to do with the subject (woodpeckers). On the other hand, I can't find any sources regarding the evolution of the woodpeckers skull, so the fact the Evolutionists are silent on the matter might be true. I'm leaving the link in for now though, since someone might have a good reason for putting it there.

Oh, and I'm removing the "silencing the opposition" part. Might be true, but has nothing to do with woodpeckers :) SaWi 07:01, 17 March 2011 (EDT)

Sorry! That was my fault - I read the front page news about wood peckers and thought of this article but I copied the wrong link - fixing it now with the correct link. Again, apology's. MaxFletcher 15:49, 17 March 2011 (EDT)