Template talk:Burma uprising

Much better! Great work, Graham. Maestro 16:11, 27 September 2007 (EDT)

Its still amateurish! Please tear and take away as you see fit, and thanks again to Ed for allowing us to do this! Graham 16:13, 27 September 2007 (EDT)

Reversion of picture etc.

TK, while I applaud your unflagging dedication to rooting out liberal bias, please bear one thing in mind. This template appears on the main page, right side. --Ed Poor ^Talk 17:30, 27 September 2007 (EDT)

• Yes, Ed...I saw the problem, and made the picture of those monks rioting much smaller. Thanks for catching it! --şŷŝôρ-₮K^{Ṣρёаќǃ} 19:14, 27 September 2007 (EDT)

• Philip, Ed and I reached an agreement about this. Thanks. --şŷŝôρ-₮K^{Ṣρёаќǃ} 23:33, 27 September 2007 (EDT)

Umm, yes? Meaning what? That nobody else can edit it? That the (non-proper) noun "clergy" should be spelt with a capital "C"? That the same applies for "military junta"? That "monks" should not be linked? That there should be no mention of the death of the Japanese journalist? That the "it" that I replaced with "the violence" should actually refer to nothing in particular? That it should be written from an American POV? That's China's comments on the situation shouldn't be there? Etc., etc.?

Unless the answer to all of those questions is "yes" (and how could it be, given that some of those things had not been in the article when you made your agreement?), then you have not explained your reversion of my edits. An explanation of each of those changes would be appreciated.

Philip J. Rayment 22:32, 30 September 2007 (EDT)