Template talk:Stub2

Any chance someone can make the text on this a bit bigger. I can barely read it. Sulgran 19:55, 11 March 2007 (EDT)

I think we should just stick with Template:Stub. There is nothing wrong with it. This template here just tries to hide the fact that there is a glaring problem with the article by blending in with the main text, thus creating the illusion of more content. --Sid 3050 22:09, 11 March 2007 (EDT)

Well, didn't know about the fact that the even WAS a second template until I was yelled at for using the first one too much, but I personally feel the same way. However, I'll use whichever is more agreed upon.--Elamdri 22:11, 11 March 2007 (EDT)

I think that Stub2 is much better... It's less intrusive and on pages where there is a single line of content, it doesn't make sense for the stub warning to be three times larger than the article. GofG _|^|_| Talk 20:08, 25 March 2007 (EDT)

I normally tended to do a quick estimation: "If the Stub2 text is longer than the entire article, it's time for the Big Bad Stub Box. Otherwise, use Stub2."

But the Webmaster decided that this is not how it's meant to be, and so there only is the Big Bad Box. *shrugs helplessly* --Sid 3050 20:23, 25 March 2007 (EDT)