User:Smallguy

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search

I'm pretty much doing a journalism project - I did a similar thing on Wikipedia, and I'd like to compare to Conservapedia. I'll be finding out how many sysops have retired (and thus what percentage).

List

Percentage of inactive sysops: 11/(28+11)= 28% Note: waiting on double checking

This should be moved to your talk page, but for now I can observe that at least 5 out of the 11 had privileges revoked. It's not our policy to discuss or disclose further information. For most of the remaining 6, the cited inactivities are not particularly striking.--Aschlafly 20:30, 23 February 2008 (EST)

Much obliged! I will be sure to note all you've told me in my article. Thanks for the time, --Smallguy 20:35, 23 February 2008 (EST)

It may not be his policy but it is ours. < removed reference >-KenH 20:36, 23 February 2008 (EST)

Smallguy, the above information by KenH is false and our 90/10 rule applies to you and KenH just like everyone else.--Aschlafly 20:39, 23 February 2008 (EST)
Ken, please do not move my comments around to mislead. Mr. Schlafly - sadly I am not here to work on the encyclopedia, I'm merely here to write an article on it for my student newspaper; so I understand I will violate the 90/10 rule, but I should not have to edit anymore because I have received all the information I think I need.--Smallguy 20:45, 23 February 2008 (EST)

And Ken, I can't print the information you provided me, because I have no confirmation of its accuracy, sorry.--Smallguy 20:48, 23 February 2008 (EST)

Part 2

I'll also be checking how experienced Conservapedian sysops were when elected (and try and compare this to Wikipedian sysops). This might be harder to do given that Conservapedia lacks an organized sysop system; however I can try using the list of users with the sysop templates and the above. (rounded up)

Average so far: 897