User talk:BobbyD

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search

"revert unexplained removal of information"

Read the relevant edit summary. The removal was explained there. EddyJ 20:10, 13 June 2013 (EDT)

Your edit summary doesn't back up what you're saying. Administration was fine with this edit for nearly two weeks. Why should you be the one to remove this information?--BobbyD 20:14, 13 June 2013 (EDT)
I'm sure the only reason the Administration was fine with it was because it's a fairly obscure article and so the parody went unnoticed. Maybe you should wait longer than twenty minutes after opening an account before trying to be an Internet Tough Guy. EddyJ 20:16, 13 June 2013 (EDT)
Sorry but I'm not being tough, just showing that this guy is overrated. I won't edit-war with you, but I share Conservapedia's opinion on this, and I'm confident that administration will revert your changes, as they hold the correct opinion on this.--BobbyD 20:29, 13 June 2013 (EDT)
There is a substantial gulf between "overrated" and "the worst" or "one of the worst" players in the game. EddyJ 20:31, 13 June 2013 (EDT)
I don't see much difference between an overrated sports star and one that never even made an impact (hence, one of the worst), so what's the difference? There is none.--BobbyD 20:37, 13 June 2013 (EDT)
I think this edit was unfounded. If you cannot prove your allegations, don't put them on the articles. brenden 22:00, 13 June 2013 (EDT)